Bourne v Nejad
The Defendant was properly served, failed to acknowledge service or defend, and the evidence establishes he published defamatory statements and engaged in harassment. The court has jurisdiction under s.10 of the Defamation Act 2013. Default judgment is granted, and a final injunction is issued in the same terms as the interim injunction. Costs are awarded to the Claimant.
- Parties
- Claimant: Martin John Bourne; Defendant: Hamed Ahmadi Nejad
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment in Default
- Outcome
- Default judgment granted for the Claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Protection From Harassment, Default Judgment, Jurisdiction, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin John Bourne
Claimant
Hamed Ahmadi Nejad
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment in Default
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant published defamatory statements about the Claimant
- 2 Whether the Defendant engaged in harassment of the Claimant
- 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction under s.10 of the Defamation Act 2013
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant was properly served, failed to acknowledge service or defend, and the evidence establishes he published defamatory statements and engaged in harassment. The court has jurisdiction under s.10 of the Defamation Act 2013. Default judgment is granted, and a final injunction is issued in the same terms as the interim injunction. Costs are awarded to the Claimant.
Court Disposition
Default judgment granted for the Claimant.
Orders
- Final injunction restraining the Defendant from publishing specified defamatory words or similar statements about the Claimant.
- Final injunction restraining the Defendant from harassing the Claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment