Chen, R. v [2023] EWHC 1472 (SCCO) (09 June 2023)
Electronic evidence must pass a threshold of sufficient importance to be included as PPE; the majority of the images and other electronic pages in this case were not sufficiently important, so the total PPE did not reach the threshold for band 6.2. The determining officer's approach was correct and the appeal fails.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 1472 (SCCO)
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Defendant: Hang Chen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Costs Appeal / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Advocates Graduated Fee Scheme, Prosecution Evidence, Electronic Evidence, PPE Calculation, Money Laundering
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Hang Chen
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Costs Appeal / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether electronic evidence served by the prosecution should be included in the calculation of PPE for AGFS banding
- 2 Whether the correct AGFS banding for counsel's fee is 6.2 or 6.4
Ratio Decidendi
Electronic evidence must pass a threshold of sufficient importance to be included as PPE; the majority of the images and other electronic pages in this case were not sufficiently important, so the total PPE did not reach the threshold for band 6.2. The determining officer's approach was correct and the appeal fails.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment