Morrell & Ors v Morrell & Ors
The deed of variation failed to include Philip and Helen Morrell as beneficiaries, contrary to Philip's intention. There was convincing proof of a different intention, a sufficient operative mistake, and clear evidence of what was intended. The requirements for rectification were satisfied.
- Parties
- Claimant: David Colin Morrell; Claimant: Raymond Philip Morrell; Claimant: Helen Mary Morrell; Defendant: Hannah Morrell; Defendant: Jack Morrell; Defendant: India Morrell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Deed, Discretionary Trust, Mistake in Legal Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Colin Morrell
Claimant
Raymond Philip Morrell
Claimant
Helen Mary Morrell
Claimant
Hannah Morrell
Defendant
Jack Morrell
Defendant
India Morrell
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deed of variation should be rectified to include Philip and Helen Morrell as beneficiaries
- 2 Whether there was a sufficient operative mistake in the deed
- 3 Whether the intention of the settlor was mis-recorded
Ratio Decidendi
The deed of variation failed to include Philip and Helen Morrell as beneficiaries, contrary to Philip's intention. There was convincing proof of a different intention, a sufficient operative mistake, and clear evidence of what was intended. The requirements for rectification were satisfied.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- The deed of variation dated 31 October 2018 is to be rectified to include Philip and Helen Morrell as beneficiaries in accordance with the draft order submitted to the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment