Morrell & Ors v Morrell & Ors

Morrell & Ors v Morrell & Ors

The deed of variation failed to include Philip and Helen Morrell as beneficiaries, contrary to Philip's intention. There was convincing proof of a different intention, a sufficient operative mistake, and clear evidence of what was intended. The requirements for rectification were satisfied.

Parties
Claimant: David Colin Morrell; Claimant: Raymond Philip Morrell; Claimant: Helen Mary Morrell; Defendant: Hannah Morrell; Defendant: Jack Morrell; Defendant: India Morrell
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed
Legal Topics
Rectification of Deed, Discretionary Trust, Mistake in Legal Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Colin Morrell

Claimant

Raymond Philip Morrell

Claimant

Helen Mary Morrell

Claimant

Hannah Morrell

Defendant

Jack Morrell

Defendant

India Morrell

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Trial Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the deed of variation should be rectified to include Philip and Helen Morrell as beneficiaries
  2. 2 Whether there was a sufficient operative mistake in the deed
  3. 3 Whether the intention of the settlor was mis-recorded

Ratio Decidendi

The deed of variation failed to include Philip and Helen Morrell as beneficiaries, contrary to Philip's intention. There was convincing proof of a different intention, a sufficient operative mistake, and clear evidence of what was intended. The requirements for rectification were satisfied.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed

Orders

  • The deed of variation dated 31 October 2018 is to be rectified to include Philip and Helen Morrell as beneficiaries in accordance with the draft order submitted to the court.