CLAIRE LORRAINE WILLIAMS v CATHERINE HILARY WILLIAMS
The deceased had testamentary capacity both when she gave instructions for and executed the 2019 Will, and there was no undue influence by Catherine. The 2019 Will was rational, duly executed, and reflected the deceased's intentions. The probate claim fails and the possession claim succeeds.
- Parties
- Claimant: Claire Lorraine Williams; Defendant/executrix: Catherine Hilary Williams; Defendant: Hanns Webber
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/property / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Probate claim dismissed; possession claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Undue Influence, Validity of Will, Estate Administration, Possession Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claire Lorraine Williams
Claimant
Catherine Hilary Williams
Defendant/executrix
Hanns Webber
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/property / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased had testamentary capacity when making the 2019 Will
- 2 Whether the 2019 Will was procured by undue influence
- 3 Whether the 2019 Will should be admitted to probate
Ratio Decidendi
The deceased had testamentary capacity both when she gave instructions for and executed the 2019 Will, and there was no undue influence by Catherine. The 2019 Will was rational, duly executed, and reflected the deceased's intentions. The probate claim fails and the possession claim succeeds.
Court Disposition
Probate claim dismissed; possession claim allowed
Orders
- 2019 Will admitted to probate
- Possession of 26 Mirador Crescent granted to Catherine Hilary Williams
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment