Bezant v Rausing & Ors

Bezant v Rausing & Ors

None of the claims advanced by Mr Bezant in the three actions disclosed reasonable grounds or real prospects of success. The alleged contract to negotiate was legally unenforceable, the claims in deceit and negligence were unparticularised and unsustainable, and the libel claims failed due to lack of publication, privilege, and absence of malice. All actions constituted an abuse of process, being collateral attacks on prior decisions and attempts to circumvent statutory remedies.

Parties
Claimant: Richard John Bezant; Defendant: Hans Anders Rausing; Defendants: Defendants 2-8, 10, 11, 14, 16; Defendants: Defendants 9, 12, 13, 15; Defendant: Defendant 17 (Mr Cork)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Applications to Strike Out and for Summary Judgment
Outcome
All claims struck out and summary judgment entered for defendants.
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Negligence, Deceit, Libel, Misfeasance, Abuse of Process, Collateral Attack, Statutory Duties, Qualified Privilege
Employment Law Company Law Insolvency Law Tort Law Defamation Unfair Dismissal Breach of Contract Negligence +7 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 39 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard John Bezant

Claimant

Hans Anders Rausing

Defendant

Defendants 2-8, 10, 11, 14, 16

Defendants

Defendants 9, 12, 13, 15

Defendants

Defendant 17 (Mr Cork)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Applications to Strike Out and for Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the statements of case disclose reasonable grounds for bringing the claims
  2. 2 Whether the claimant has a real prospect of succeeding on the claims
  3. 3 Whether the actions constitute an abuse of process

Ratio Decidendi

None of the claims advanced by Mr Bezant in the three actions disclosed reasonable grounds or real prospects of success. The alleged contract to negotiate was legally unenforceable, the claims in deceit and negligence were unparticularised and unsustainable, and the libel claims failed due to lack of publication, privilege, and absence of malice. All actions constituted an abuse of process, being collateral attacks on prior decisions and attempts to circumvent statutory remedies.

Court Disposition

All claims struck out and summary judgment entered for defendants.

Orders

  • All three actions dismissed.
  • Declaration that English courts lack jurisdiction over claims relating to removal as director of Portuguese company.