Tates (Agents) Limited & Anor v Caroline Nicholas & Anor
The appeal succeeded on both grounds: damages for harassment were reduced to £15,000 due to improper consideration of unpleaded matters, and the appellant's costs liability was limited to the harassment claim only, not the entire proceedings.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Tates (Agents) Limited; Claimant/respondent: Kim Alexander Gottileb; Defendant/appellant: Caroline Nicholas; Defendant/appellant: Joesph Asombang
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Consequential Judgment Following Substantive Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; damages reduced; costs liability limited; payment on account of costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Harassment, Costs, Damages, Joint Liability, Adjournment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tates (Agents) Limited
Claimant/respondent
Kim Alexander Gottileb
Claimant/respondent
Caroline Nicholas
Defendant/appellant
Joesph Asombang
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Consequential Judgment Following Substantive Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Judge erred by taking into account unpleaded matters in determining harassment and quantifying damages
- 2 Whether the appellant was jointly liable for costs of proceedings when not a party to all claims
- 3 Entitlement to costs following reduction of damages
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal succeeded on both grounds: damages for harassment were reduced to £15,000 due to improper consideration of unpleaded matters, and the appellant's costs liability was limited to the harassment claim only, not the entire proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; damages reduced; costs liability limited; payment on account of costs ordered.
Orders
- Damages for harassment reduced to £15,000 plus interest.
- Appellant entitled to costs of appeal on both grounds.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment