Director of Public Prosecutions v Hardy [2008] EWHC 2874 (Admin) (30 October 2008)
There was a prima facie case of harassment based on the evidence, and no reasonable bench could have found otherwise; the magistrates' decision was perverse and the case should be remitted for retrial.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 2874 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Defendant: Hardy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Appeal From Magistrates' Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted for retrial before a different bench of justices.
- Legal Topics
- Harassment, Protection From Harassment Act 1997, Burden of Proof, Reasonableness of Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Claimant
Hardy
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Appeal From Magistrates' Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrates' decision that there was no case to answer was perverse
- 2 Whether the conduct amounted to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
- 3 Whether the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable under Section 1(3)(c)
Ratio Decidendi
There was a prima facie case of harassment based on the evidence, and no reasonable bench could have found otherwise; the magistrates' decision was perverse and the case should be remitted for retrial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted for retrial before a different bench of justices.
Orders
- Case remitted to Gwynedd Justices for retrial by a different panel.
- No order for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment