Walters v Olins
There was sufficient evidence for the finding of a mutual wills contract between Mr Walters and the Deceased, and the terms were sufficiently certain to impose an immediate constructive trust on Mr Walters in relation to the Deceased’s property left to him. The judge was correct in making the declaration that the codicils take effect as mutual wills binding the Deceased’s estate in the hands of Mr Walters.
- Parties
- Appellant: Harold Walters; Respondent: Andrew Robert Olins
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mutual Wills, Constructive Trusts, Testamentary Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harold Walters
Appellant
Andrew Robert Olins
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was sufficient evidence of a mutual wills contract between Mr Walters and the Deceased
- 2 Whether the terms of the alleged mutual wills contract were sufficiently certain in law
Ratio Decidendi
There was sufficient evidence for the finding of a mutual wills contract between Mr Walters and the Deceased, and the terms were sufficiently certain to impose an immediate constructive trust on Mr Walters in relation to the Deceased’s property left to him. The judge was correct in making the declaration that the codicils take effect as mutual wills binding the Deceased’s estate in the hands of Mr Walters.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that the codicils executed by Mr Walters and the Deceased on 18 May 1998 take effect as mutual wills binding the Deceased’s estate in the hands of Mr Walters and his personal representatives
- Pronouncement in solemn form for the Deceased’s last will dated 11 March 1988 and its codicil dated 18 May 1998
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment