Jolly v Harsco Infrastructure Services Ltd [2012] EWHC 3086 (QB) (05 November 2012)
There is no power under CPR Part 36 to enter judgment following late acceptance of a Part 36 offer without the defendant's consent; the appropriate order is a stay under CPR 36.10 and 36.11, with costs to be determined accordingly.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 3086
- Parties
- Claimant: Margaret Jolly; Defendant: Harsco Infrastructure Services Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Fatal Asbestos Exposure / Post Liability Acceptance, Determination of Judgment or Consent Order
- Outcome
- Judgment not entered; action stayed under CPR 36.10 and 36.11.
- Legal Topics
- CPR Part 36 Offers, Costs Consequences, Judgment Entry, Liability Apportionment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Jolly
Claimant
Harsco Infrastructure Services Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Fatal Asbestos Exposure / Post Liability Acceptance, Determination of Judgment or Consent Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether judgment should be entered for damages to be assessed following late acceptance of a Part 36 offer
- 2 Whether CPR 36.14 applies to costs and interest in these circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
There is no power under CPR Part 36 to enter judgment following late acceptance of a Part 36 offer without the defendant's consent; the appropriate order is a stay under CPR 36.10 and 36.11, with costs to be determined accordingly.
Court Disposition
Judgment not entered; action stayed under CPR 36.10 and 36.11.
Orders
- Issue of liability stayed upon terms of claimant's offer.
- Costs relating to liability issue postponed to be dealt with under CPR 36.10(4) and (5) or CPR 44.3.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment