Hartwell Services Ltd v Chambers [2001] EWCA Civ 774 (15 May 2001)
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to make findings on the central issue of whether the employer intended to replace the employee with Mr Briggs and whether the employer's conduct amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract; this omission required the matter to be remitted for proper determination.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 774
- Parties
- Appellant: Hartwell Services Ltd; Respondent: Mr AGJ Chambers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Implied Term of Mutual Trust and Confidence, Breach of Contract, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hartwell Services Ltd
Appellant
Mr AGJ Chambers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to address the significance of the appointment of Mr Briggs and whether the employer's conduct amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract entitling the employee to claim constructive dismissal
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to make findings on the central issue of whether the employer intended to replace the employee with Mr Briggs and whether the employer's conduct amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract; this omission required the matter to be remitted for proper determination.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Matter to be remitted to a differently constituted Employment Tribunal for determination if not resolved by agreement or ADR
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment