R v Haseeb Majid
The judge was entitled to take a 25-year starting point for the minimum term under Schedule 21, paragraph 4(2), as the appellant took the knife to the scene intending to have it available for use as a weapon, consistent with the jury's verdict. However, the aggravating factor of planning or premeditation was...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Haseeb Majid; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Minimum Term, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Jury Verdict Consistency
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haseeb Majid
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's findings of fact were inconsistent with the jury's verdict on Count 2
- 2 Whether the statutory starting point for the minimum term was correctly identified
- 3 Whether the minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to take a 25-year starting point for the minimum term under Schedule 21, paragraph 4(2), as the appellant took the knife to the scene intending to have it available for use as a weapon, consistent with the jury's verdict. However, the aggravating factor of planning or premeditation was inconsistent with the jury's verdict and could not be sustained. The mitigating factors substantially outweighed the aggravating factors, warranting a reduction of the minimum term to 22 years and 137 days.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Minimum term reduced to 22 years and 137 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment