R v Hassan Serdoud

R v Hassan Serdoud

The judge was entitled to find, on the balance of probabilities, that the appellant intended to evade or delay justice by remaining abroad and failed to discharge the burden of showing a reasonable excuse for failing to surrender to bail; no appearance of bias was established; sentencing in the highest culpability and harm category was justified by the deliberate evasion and impact on the justice system.

Parties
Appellant: Hassan Serdoud; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Failure to Surrender to Bail, Appearance of Bias, Sentencing Guidelines, Medical Evidence in Criminal Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hassan Serdoud

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the judge's conduct gave rise to an appearance of bias or prejudice
  2. 2 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for failing to surrender to bail
  3. 3 Whether the judge's findings were open to him on the evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to find, on the balance of probabilities, that the appellant intended to evade or delay justice by remaining abroad and failed to discharge the burden of showing a reasonable excuse for failing to surrender to bail; no appearance of bias was established; sentencing in the highest culpability and harm category was justified by the deliberate evasion and impact on the justice system.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction for failing to surrender to bail upheld
  • sentence of 2 months' imprisonment consecutive to substantive sentence upheld