Odone v Hawarden Services Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 1694 (QB) (23 May 2014)
Shannon Odone had a better title to the containers and spares than any other contender, having acquired the right to become registered as legal owner. HAS was bailee of the containers and liable in conversion for misdelivery to Mark Petrie, regardless of its knowledge of true ownership. There was no actionable...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 1694 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Shannon Odone; Defendant: Hawarden Services Ltd; Defendant: Caroline Craft; Defendant: Mark Alexander Petrie; Defendant: Ray Middleton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim for conversion against Hawarden Services Ltd succeeds; claims for conspiracy and against Caroline Craft personally fail; damages not awarded as no evidence adduced.
- Legal Topics
- Bailment, Conversion, Trespass to Goods, Conspiracy, Ownership of Goods, Joint Tortfeasor Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shannon Odone
Claimant
Hawarden Services Ltd
Defendant
Caroline Craft
Defendant
Mark Alexander Petrie
Defendant
Ray Middleton
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Did Shannon Odone own the containers and their contents?
- 2 Was there a conspiracy by Ray Middleton and Mark Petrie to injure Shannon Odone by unlawful means?
- 3 Is Hawarden Services Ltd (HAS) liable as bailee for the loss of the containers?
Ratio Decidendi
Shannon Odone had a better title to the containers and spares than any other contender, having acquired the right to become registered as legal owner. HAS was bailee of the containers and liable in conversion for misdelivery to Mark Petrie, regardless of its knowledge of true ownership. There was no actionable conspiracy as the defendants did not know or believe Shannon Odone was the true owner. Caroline Craft was not personally liable as joint tortfeasor as her actions did not go beyond her role as director. Damages were not awarded as no evidence was adduced at trial.
Court Disposition
Claim for conversion against Hawarden Services Ltd succeeds; claims for conspiracy and against Caroline Craft personally fail; damages not awarded as no evidence adduced.
Orders
- Judgment for the claimant against Hawarden Services Ltd for conversion;
- Claims for conspiracy and against Caroline Craft personally dismissed;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment