Hawksworth v Chief Constable of Staffordshire & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 293 (16 February 2012)
The appellant's objection to the evidence on sound attenuation software was not properly raised at trial; even if it had been, the evidence was sufficiently disclosed and relevant. The judge's findings against the claimant were independently justified on the evidence, and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 293
- Parties
- Appellant: Hawksworth; Respondents: Chief Constable of Staffordshire and Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Liability, Noise at Work, Pleadings and Evidence, Expert Evidence, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hawksworth
Appellant
Chief Constable of Staffordshire and Anr
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in allowing evidence concerning sound attenuation software not specifically pleaded by the defendants
- 2 Whether the appellant was denied a fair trial due to lack of notice regarding the sound attenuation software evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's objection to the evidence on sound attenuation software was not properly raised at trial; even if it had been, the evidence was sufficiently disclosed and relevant. The judge's findings against the claimant were independently justified on the evidence, and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment