Al-Khyami v El-Muderris [2018] EWHC 24 (QB) (19 January 2018)
The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendant unlawfully took or converted the claimed items. The defendant's account of lawful acquisition was corroborated by independent witnesses and documentary evidence. The claimant's evidence was unreliable, and there was no direct or credible evidence of conversion by the defendant.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 24
- Parties
- Claimant: Amre Al-Khyami; Defendant: Haydar El-Muderris
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Conversion / Damages / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conversion, Damages, Burden of Proof, Credibility of Witnesses, Collateral for Loans
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amre Al-Khyami
Claimant
Haydar El-Muderris
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Conversion / Damages / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant unlawfully converted luxury goods belonging to the claimant
- 2 Whether the claimant owned or had the right to possession of the items
- 3 Whether the defendant acquired the items lawfully or by theft/conversion
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendant unlawfully took or converted the claimed items. The defendant's account of lawful acquisition was corroborated by independent witnesses and documentary evidence. The claimant's evidence was unreliable, and there was no direct or credible evidence of conversion by the defendant.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim dismissed. No damages awarded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment