Al-Khyami v El-Muderris [2018] EWHC 24 (QB) (19 January 2018)

Al-Khyami v El-Muderris [2018] EWHC 24 (QB) (19 January 2018)

The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendant unlawfully converted the claimed items. The defendant's account of lawful acquisition was preferred, supported by independent evidence. There was no credible evidence of unlawful taking by the defendant, and the claim was dismissed.

Citation
[2018] EWHC 24 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Amre Al-Khyami; Defendant: Haydar El-Muderris
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 January 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Conversion (tort) / Trial Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Conversion, Damages, Credibility of Witnesses, Burden of Proof, Aggravated Damages
Tort Law Civil Litigation Conversion Damages Credibility of Witnesses Burden of Proof Aggravated Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amre Al-Khyami

Claimant

Haydar El-Muderris

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Conversion (tort) / Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant unlawfully converted luxury goods belonging to the claimant
  2. 2 Whether the claimant had ownership or right to possession of the items
  3. 3 Whether the defendant acquired the items lawfully or unlawfully

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendant unlawfully converted the claimed items. The defendant's account of lawful acquisition was preferred, supported by independent evidence. There was no credible evidence of unlawful taking by the defendant, and the claim was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed