Gillan & Ors v HEC Enterprises Ltd & Ors
The administrators are not entitled to a general declaration under the Berkeley Applegate principle; any entitlement to remuneration must be specifically claimed and quantified, with notice to beneficiaries. The administrators must pay the claimants' costs of the application for permission to continue proceedings up to 12 August 2016 in full, and 50% thereafter, with only limited recovery from trust assets for compliance with registrar's directions. The administrators must pay the claimants' costs of the Berkeley Applegate application. Other parties served with the application are entitled to their recoverable costs on the standard basis.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ian Gillan; Claimant: Roger Glover; Claimant: Ian Paice; Claimant: Victoria Lord and Keith Glover (as Executors of the Estate of Jon Lord); Defendant: HEC Enterprises Limited (in administration); Defendant: Deep Purple (Overseas) Limited (in administration); Defendant: Mark Supperstone; Defendant: Simon Harris; Other: Manuela Edwards; Other: Richard Blackmore; Other: David Coverdale
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Company/insolvency / Post Judgment, Costs and Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Administrators' application for a general declaration refused; directions given for any future claims under Berkeley Applegate; costs orders made against administrators.
- Legal Topics
- Berkeley Applegate Principle, Administrators' Remuneration, Costs Orders, Permission to Continue Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Gillan
Claimant
Roger Glover
Claimant
Ian Paice
Claimant
Victoria Lord and Keith Glover (as Executors of the Estate of Jon Lord)
Claimant
HEC Enterprises Limited (in administration)
Defendant
Deep Purple (Overseas) Limited (in administration)
Defendant
Mark Supperstone
Defendant
Simon Harris
Defendant
Manuela Edwards
Other
Richard Blackmore
Other
David Coverdale
Other
Procedural Posture
Company/insolvency / Post Judgment, Costs and Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 What orders should be made regarding the administrators' Berkeley Applegate application?
- 2 How should costs be allocated for the claimants' application for permission to continue proceedings?
- 3 How should costs be allocated for the Berkeley Applegate application among parties?
Ratio Decidendi
The administrators are not entitled to a general declaration under the Berkeley Applegate principle; any entitlement to remuneration must be specifically claimed and quantified, with notice to beneficiaries. The administrators must pay the claimants' costs of the application for permission to continue proceedings up to 12 August 2016 in full, and 50% thereafter, with only limited recovery from trust assets for compliance with registrar's directions. The administrators must pay the claimants' costs of the Berkeley Applegate application. Other parties served with the application are entitled to their recoverable costs on the standard basis.
Court Disposition
Administrators' application for a general declaration refused; directions given for any future claims under Berkeley Applegate; costs orders made against administrators.
Orders
- Administrators to serve itemised account to beneficiaries within 28 days if seeking remuneration.
- If no agreement, administrators may apply for inquiry before registrar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment