Fresh 'n' Clean (Wales) Ltd v Miah & Ors [2006] EWHC 903 (Ch) (29 March 2006)

Fresh 'n' Clean (Wales) Ltd v Miah & Ors [2006] EWHC 903 (Ch) (29 March 2006)

Mr. Singh's mental state was dishonest; he and Hillgate knowingly assisted Mr. Miah's breaches of duty to the Company by participating in fraudulent VAT arrangements. Judgment entered against Mr. Miah, Hillgate, and Mr. Singh.

Citation
[2006] EWHC 903 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Fresh 'N' Clean (Wales) Limited (In Liquidation); Defendant: Helim Miah; Defendant: Hilgate Corporation Limited; Defendant: Janail Singh; Defendant: Trademaster Limited; Defendant: German Giovanni de La Torre
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Claim / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for claimant against Mr. Miah, Hillgate, and Mr. Singh; claims against Trademaster and Mr. De La Torre settled.
Legal Topics
Dishonest Assistance, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, VAT Fraud, Accessory Liability
Insolvency Fraud Company Law Dishonest Assistance Breach of Fiduciary Duty VAT Fraud Accessory Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fresh 'N' Clean (Wales) Limited (In Liquidation)

Claimant

Helim Miah

Defendant

Hilgate Corporation Limited

Defendant

Janail Singh

Defendant

Trademaster Limited

Defendant

German Giovanni de La Torre

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Chancery Division Civil Claim / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Did Mr. Miah breach fiduciary duties to the Company?
  2. 2 Did Hillgate and Mr. Singh dishonestly assist Mr. Miah's breaches?
  3. 3 Was the transactional arrangement fraudulent and designed to facilitate MTIC VAT fraud?

Ratio Decidendi

Mr. Singh's mental state was dishonest; he and Hillgate knowingly assisted Mr. Miah's breaches of duty to the Company by participating in fraudulent VAT arrangements. Judgment entered against Mr. Miah, Hillgate, and Mr. Singh.

Court Disposition

Judgment for claimant against Mr. Miah, Hillgate, and Mr. Singh; claims against Trademaster and Mr. De La Torre settled.

Orders

  • Judgment entered for £11,603,354.60 plus interest at 5.6% from 26 January 2005 to date of order.
  • Permission to appeal refused.