Douglas & Ors v Hello! Ltd & Ors [2003] EWHC 786 (Ch) (11 April 2003)
The court held that the claimants' wedding, despite their celebrity status and the number of guests, was a private event with clear and reasonable steps taken to ensure privacy and exclusivity. The defendants' acquisition and publication of unauthorised photographs constituted a breach of confidence and misuse of private information. The defendants were also found liable for inducing or procuring a breach of the exclusive contract between the claimants and OK! magazine. Liability was established against the first five defendants; quantum of damages was reserved for later determination.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 786 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Michael Douglas; Claimant: Catherine Zeta-Jones; Claimant: Northern & Shell PLC; Defendant: Hello! Ltd.; Defendant: Hola, S.A.; Defendant: Eduardo Sanchez Junco; Defendant: The Marquesa de Varela (Maria J. Marin); Defendant: Neneta Overseas Ltd.; Defendant: Philip Ramey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Liability Trial (split Trial; Quantum Reserved)
- Outcome
- Liability established against the first five defendants; quantum of damages to be determined in a subsequent hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Confidence, Misuse of Private Information, Exclusive Rights, Photographic Rights, Damages, Injunctions, Media Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Douglas
Claimant
Catherine Zeta-Jones
Claimant
Northern & Shell PLC
Claimant
Hello! Ltd.
Defendant
Hola, S.A.
Defendant
Eduardo Sanchez Junco
Defendant
The Marquesa de Varela (Maria J. Marin)
Defendant
Neneta Overseas Ltd.
Defendant
Philip Ramey
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Liability Trial (split Trial; Quantum Reserved)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants are liable for breach of confidence and/or misuse of private information by publishing unauthorised photographs of the claimants' wedding
- 2 Whether the defendants induced or procured a breach of contract between the claimants and OK! magazine
- 3 Whether the defendants' actions constituted an actionable wrong under English law
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the claimants' wedding, despite their celebrity status and the number of guests, was a private event with clear and reasonable steps taken to ensure privacy and exclusivity. The defendants' acquisition and publication of unauthorised photographs constituted a breach of confidence and misuse of private information. The defendants were also found liable for inducing or procuring a breach of the exclusive contract between the claimants and OK! magazine. Liability was established against the first five defendants; quantum of damages was reserved for later determination.
Court Disposition
Liability established against the first five defendants; quantum of damages to be determined in a subsequent hearing.
Orders
- Declaration of liability for breach of confidence and misuse of private information against the first five defendants.
- Declaration of liability for inducing breach of contract against the first five defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment