R v Henderson Domingo

R v Henderson Domingo

There were no arguable grounds of appeal against conviction; the judge's rulings and directions were correct, the summing-up was fair and balanced, and there was no basis to consider the conviction unsafe. No good reason was provided to admit fresh evidence at this stage.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: Henderson Domingo
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Extension of Time
Outcome
application for extension of time and renewed application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Robbery, Attempted Robbery, Possession of Bladed Article, Admissibility of Evidence, Fresh Evidence, Jury Directions, Appeal Against Conviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Henderson Domingo

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the conviction was unsafe due to alleged errors in the trial process
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in admitting certain evidence
  3. 3 Whether the summing-up and jury directions were fair and accurate

Ratio Decidendi

There were no arguable grounds of appeal against conviction; the judge's rulings and directions were correct, the summing-up was fair and balanced, and there was no basis to consider the conviction unsafe. No good reason was provided to admit fresh evidence at this stage.

Court Disposition

application for extension of time and renewed application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application for extension of time refused
  • Renewed application for leave to appeal refused