Attorney General's Reference No 87 of 2006
The sentence imposed was lenient but not unduly so; the Recorder was entitled to conclude that the statutory assumption of risk did not apply, and the total sentence was at the bottom of the permissible range but not outside it. The application to increase the sentence is refused.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Her Majesty's Attorney General; Offender/respondent: Daniel Peter Geddes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Application to Review Sentence as Unduly Lenient
- Outcome
- Application refused; sentence not increased.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Threats to Kill, Domestic Violence, Burglary, Imprisonment for Public Protection
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Attorney General
Applicant
Daniel Peter Geddes
Offender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Application to Review Sentence as Unduly Lenient
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence for making a threat to kill was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether imprisonment for public protection under section 225 Criminal Justice Act 2003 should have been imposed
- 3 Whether the total determinate sentence sufficiently reflected the gravity of the offending
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was lenient but not unduly so; the Recorder was entitled to conclude that the statutory assumption of risk did not apply, and the total sentence was at the bottom of the permissible range but not outside it. The application to increase the sentence is refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused; sentence not increased.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment