Attorney-General's Reference No 27 & 28 Of 2008
The original sentence was unduly lenient given the aggravating features, including persistent bullying, violence, and recklessness leading to death. A starting point of less than 10 years was inappropriate; a sentence of 7½ years' imprisonment is substituted for both offenders.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Her Majesty's Attorney-General; Respondent: Christopher Marcus Lewis; Respondent: Marvin James Walker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence increased on reference
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing, Attorney General's Reference, Unduly Lenient Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Attorney-General
Applicant
Christopher Marcus Lewis
Respondent
Marvin James Walker
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Reference / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for manslaughter was unduly lenient
- 2 Appropriate starting point for sentencing in cases of manslaughter involving bullying and recklessness
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient given the aggravating features, including persistent bullying, violence, and recklessness leading to death. A starting point of less than 10 years was inappropriate; a sentence of 7½ years' imprisonment is substituted for both offenders.
Court Disposition
sentence increased on reference
Orders
- Original sentences quashed
- Substituted sentence of 7½ years' imprisonment for both offenders
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment