Tame, R. v
The original suspended sentence and drug rehabilitation requirement were unduly lenient given the seriousness of the offences, aggravating factors, and lack of sufficient prospect of success for rehabilitation. The proper sentence was three years' imprisonment, which could not be suspended.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Offender: Adam Tame; Applicant: Her Majesty's Solicitor General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Reference for Review of Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Sentences quashed as unduly lenient; substituted with custodial sentences.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Possession With Intent to Supply, Possession of Criminal Property, Possession of Bladed Article, Suspended Sentences, Drug Rehabilitation Requirement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adam Tame
Offender
Her Majesty's Solicitor General
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Reference for Review of Sentence Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence was unduly lenient
- 2 Appropriateness of suspended sentence and drug rehabilitation requirement
- 3 Proper application of sentencing guidelines for drug offences
Ratio Decidendi
The original suspended sentence and drug rehabilitation requirement were unduly lenient given the seriousness of the offences, aggravating factors, and lack of sufficient prospect of success for rehabilitation. The proper sentence was three years' imprisonment, which could not be suspended.
Court Disposition
Sentences quashed as unduly lenient; substituted with custodial sentences.
Orders
- Three years' imprisonment for each drug offence, concurrent.
- Six months' imprisonment for possession of criminal property, concurrent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment