R v Mark Page
The sentence imposed was unduly lenient because the overall criminality, involving separate and distinct offences against different victims, was not adequately reflected by concurrent sentences. Consecutive sentences for Counts 4 and 5 were required to mark the seriousness and distinctness of the offences. The appropriate total sentence is 18 years' imprisonment.
- Parties
- Applicant: Her Majesty's Solicitor General; Offender/respondent: Mark Page
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by Solicitor General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988 and Offender's Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence increased on reference; offender's application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Child Exploitation, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Solicitor General
Applicant
Mark Page
Offender/respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Solicitor General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988 and Offender's Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Mark Page was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether the judge erred in imposing concurrent rather than consecutive sentences
- 3 Whether the dangerousness provisions should have been considered
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was unduly lenient because the overall criminality, involving separate and distinct offences against different victims, was not adequately reflected by concurrent sentences. Consecutive sentences for Counts 4 and 5 were required to mark the seriousness and distinctness of the offences. The appropriate total sentence is 18 years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
sentence increased on reference; offender's application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave granted to Solicitor General to refer sentence as unduly lenient
- Sentence on Counts 4 and 5 quashed and substituted with nine years' imprisonment each, to run concurrently with Counts 2 and 3 but consecutive to each other, total 18 years' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment