Wilkinson, R. v
The original sentence was unduly lenient because the judge wrongly reduced the starting point from five to four years before applying credit for the guilty plea, failing to account for aggravating factors. The correct approach was to increase the starting point to not less than six years, resulting in a sentence of four years and six months after credit for the guilty plea.
- Parties
- Applicant: Her Majesty's Solicitor General; Respondent: Dean Wilkinson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Attorney General's Reference Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Attorney General's Reference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Solicitor General
Applicant
Dean Wilkinson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Attorney General's Reference Under Section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence for robbery was unduly lenient
- 2 Appropriate categorisation and starting point under Sentencing Council guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was unduly lenient because the judge wrongly reduced the starting point from five to four years before applying credit for the guilty plea, failing to account for aggravating factors. The correct approach was to increase the starting point to not less than six years, resulting in a sentence of four years and six months after credit for the guilty plea.
Court Disposition
sentence increased
Orders
- Original sentence of three years' imprisonment set aside.
- Substituted sentence of four years and six months' imprisonment imposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment