M & Ors v Her Majesty's Treasury & Ors
Payment of social security benefits to claimants who are spouses of listed persons and live with them constitutes making funds available indirectly for the benefit of listed persons under Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 and Article 7 of The Al-Qa’ida and Taliban (United Nations Measures) Order 2002. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: M; Claimant: A; Claimant: MM; Defendant: Her Majesty’s Treasury; Interested Party: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Works and Pensions; Interested Party: London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham; Interested Party: Birmingham City Council; Interested Party: Manchester City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Substantive Applications
- Outcome
- Applications for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Implementation of UN Sanctions, Interpretation of EU Regulations, Social Security Benefits, Anti Terrorism Measures
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Claimant
A
Claimant
MM
Claimant
Her Majesty’s Treasury
Defendant
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Interested Party
Secretary of State for Works and Pensions
Interested Party
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Interested Party
Birmingham City Council
Interested Party
Manchester City Council
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Substantive Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payment of social security benefits to spouses of listed persons constitutes making funds available to or for the benefit of listed persons under Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 and Article 7 of The Al-Qa’ida and Taliban (United Nations Measures) Order 2002
- 2 Whether the term 'basic expenses' in Treasury licences is so vague as to be unlawful
Ratio Decidendi
Payment of social security benefits to claimants who are spouses of listed persons and live with them constitutes making funds available indirectly for the benefit of listed persons under Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 and Article 7 of The Al-Qa’ida and Taliban (United Nations Measures) Order 2002. The term 'basic expenses' in Treasury licences is sufficiently clear and lawful.
Court Disposition
Applications for judicial review dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment