Poole & Ors v Her Majesty's Treasury [2006] EWHC 2731 (Comm) (08 November 2006)
Directive 73/239/EEC (the Insurance Directive) does not confer rights on Lloyd's Names as individuals for the purposes of a Francovich claim against the UK government. The Directive's purpose is to facilitate freedom of establishment for insurers and to protect insureds and third parties, not to grant rights to those underwriting insurance at Lloyd's. Accordingly, the Claimants' claims fail on the Grant of Rights Issue. The Limitation Issue is not determinative given the failure of the substantive claim, but the applicable limitation period would be six years from accrual, subject to arguments on knowledge and EU law principles.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 2731 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Frederick Thomas Poole and Others (Names Action For Compensation And Defence In Europe); Defendant: Her Majesty's Treasury
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Group Litigation (commercial Court) / First Sub Trial on Preliminary Issues (grant of Rights and Limitation)
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed on preliminary issue (no actionable right under Directive)
- Legal Topics
- State Liability for Failure to Implement EU Directives, Limitation Periods for Tort Claims, Rights Under Insurance Directives, Solvency and Regulation of Lloyd's Syndicates
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frederick Thomas Poole and Others (Names Action For Compensation And Defence In Europe)
Claimant
Her Majesty's Treasury
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Group Litigation (commercial Court) / First Sub Trial on Preliminary Issues (grant of Rights and Limitation)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Directive 73/239/EEC (the Insurance Directive) confer rights on Lloyd's Names to found a claim for damages against the UK government for failure to implement the Directive?
- 2 Are the claims by Lloyd's Names time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980 or subject to an extended limitation period under EU law principles?
Ratio Decidendi
Directive 73/239/EEC (the Insurance Directive) does not confer rights on Lloyd's Names as individuals for the purposes of a Francovich claim against the UK government. The Directive's purpose is to facilitate freedom of establishment for insurers and to protect insureds and third parties, not to grant rights to those underwriting insurance at Lloyd's. Accordingly, the Claimants' claims fail on the Grant of Rights Issue. The Limitation Issue is not determinative given the failure of the substantive claim, but the applicable limitation period would be six years from accrual, subject to arguments on knowledge and EU law principles.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed on preliminary issue (no actionable right under Directive)
Orders
- Claimants' claims are dismissed on the Grant of Rights Issue.
- No determination required on the Limitation Issue in light of the above.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment