Rosserlane Consultants Ltd & Anor v Herbert Smith Llp [2009] EWHC 90135 (Costs) (12 February 2009)
A third party applicant under s.71 Solicitors Act 1974 is not entitled as of right to inspect privileged documents belonging to the solicitor's client; privilege is not waived by consent to assessment or by partial disclosure in this context; the breakdown of costs must comply with Precedent P to allow proper scrutiny.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 90135 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant: Rosserlane Consultants Ltd; Claimant: Swinbrook Properties Ltd; Defendant: Herbert Smith LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Solicitors Act 1974, S.71 for Inspection of Documents and Assessment of Solicitor's Bill / Post Hearing Judgment on Application for Inspection and Directions
- Outcome
- Application for inspection refused; direction for amended breakdown of costs granted.
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Detailed Assessment of Solicitors' Bills, Third Party Rights Under Solicitors Act 1974, Disclosure and Inspection of Documents, Breakdown of Solicitors' Fees
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rosserlane Consultants Ltd
Claimant
Swinbrook Properties Ltd
Claimant
Herbert Smith LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application Under Solicitors Act 1974, S.71 for Inspection of Documents and Assessment of Solicitor's Bill / Post Hearing Judgment on Application for Inspection and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a third party applicant under s.71 Solicitors Act 1974 is entitled to inspect privileged documents held by the solicitor for the client
- 2 Whether privilege is waived by consent to assessment or by partial disclosure
- 3 Adequacy of breakdown of solicitors' fees for assessment purposes
Ratio Decidendi
A third party applicant under s.71 Solicitors Act 1974 is not entitled as of right to inspect privileged documents belonging to the solicitor's client; privilege is not waived by consent to assessment or by partial disclosure in this context; the breakdown of costs must comply with Precedent P to allow proper scrutiny.
Court Disposition
Application for inspection refused; direction for amended breakdown of costs granted.
Orders
- Application for disclosure and inspection dismissed.
- Herbert Smith LLP to serve an amended breakdown of costs complying with Precedent P within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment