R v Hersh Osman

R v Hersh Osman

There was no arguable error in the sentence imposed; it was justified by the facts and the sentencing guideline. The sentence was not manifestly excessive, and the application for leave to appeal and extension of time was refused.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: Hersh Osman
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Sentence
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Arson, Sentencing, Appeals, Extension of Time
Criminal Law Arson Sentencing Appeals Extension of Time

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Hersh Osman

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
  2. 2 Whether there was any arguable error in the sentencing process
  3. 3 Whether there was justification for an extension of time to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

There was no arguable error in the sentence imposed; it was justified by the facts and the sentencing guideline. The sentence was not manifestly excessive, and the application for leave to appeal and extension of time was refused.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Application for extension of time refused
  • Application for leave to appeal sentence refused