Mahmood Jasim Zeboon Alsaady v Ali Al Hamadani & Ors
The Claimant's initiation of parallel proceedings in Iraq after substantially losing in England constitutes vexatious and oppressive conduct. The English court's jurisdiction and the finality of its litigation must be protected. No sufficient evidence was adduced to show that Iraqi authorities compelled the Claimant or that Iraqi heritage law should override the English court's discretion. An anti-suit injunction is granted to restrain the Iraqi proceedings.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Mahmood Jasim Zeboon Alsaady; Defendant/applicant: Ali Al Hamadani; Defendant/applicant: Almaghir Al Hamadani; Defendant/applicant: Yaseen Al Hamadani; Defendant/applicant: Alhasan Al Hamadani; Defendant: H&H Gallery (A Firm); Defendant: H&H Gallery Limited; Defendant: Hamdani Brothers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Anti Suit Injunction / Post Trial, Determination of ASI Application
- Outcome
- Anti-suit injunction granted; costs awarded to Applicants on standard basis.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Parallel Proceedings, Comity, Vexatious Litigation, Partnership Disputes, Cultural Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahmood Jasim Zeboon Alsaady
Claimant/respondent
Ali Al Hamadani
Defendant/applicant
Almaghir Al Hamadani
Defendant/applicant
Yaseen Al Hamadani
Defendant/applicant
Alhasan Al Hamadani
Defendant/applicant
H&H Gallery (A Firm)
Defendant
H&H Gallery Limited
Defendant
Hamdani Brothers Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Anti Suit Injunction / Post Trial, Determination of ASI Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant's initiation of parallel proceedings in Iraq constitutes vexatious or oppressive conduct justifying an anti-suit injunction
- 2 Whether principles of comity and Iraqi heritage law affect the grant of an anti-suit injunction
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded and on what basis
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant's initiation of parallel proceedings in Iraq after substantially losing in England constitutes vexatious and oppressive conduct. The English court's jurisdiction and the finality of its litigation must be protected. No sufficient evidence was adduced to show that Iraqi authorities compelled the Claimant or that Iraqi heritage law should override the English court's discretion. An anti-suit injunction is granted to restrain the Iraqi proceedings.
Court Disposition
Anti-suit injunction granted; costs awarded to Applicants on standard basis.
Orders
- Order restraining the Claimant from pursuing the Iraqi proceedings against the Applicants, save as regards claims compelled by Iraqi authorities relating to heritage protection (subject to evidence)
- Costs awarded to Applicants on standard basis, to be determined summarily on paper
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment