Grosvenor v High-Point Rendel Group Plc (Costs) [2004] EWHC 3057 (TCC) (30 September 2004)

Grosvenor v High-Point Rendel Group Plc (Costs) [2004] EWHC 3057 (TCC) (30 September 2004)

Defendant was the successful party on the vast majority of issues; claimant's claims were grossly exaggerated and unreasonably pursued; claimant failed to accept a reasonable admissible offer from defendant; issue-based costs orders are appropriate given clear and distinct issues.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 3057 (TCC)
Parties
Claimant: Richard Grosvenor; Defendant: High-Point Rendel Group PLC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Costs Judgment / Post Trial
Outcome
Costs apportioned: claimant recovers 25% of his costs pre-14 January 2004; defendant recovers 75% of its costs pre-14 January 2004; claimant bears own costs post-14 January 2004; defendant recovers 75% of its costs post-14 January 2004.
Legal Topics
Costs, Issue Based Costs Orders, Offers to Settle, Conduct of Parties
Civil Procedure Costs Issue Based Costs Orders Offers to Settle Conduct of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Grosvenor

Claimant

High-Point Rendel Group PLC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Costs Judgment / Post Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Who is the successful party for costs purposes?
  2. 2 Effect of admissible offers to settle on costs
  3. 3 Impact of parties' conduct on costs orders

Ratio Decidendi

Defendant was the successful party on the vast majority of issues; claimant's claims were grossly exaggerated and unreasonably pursued; claimant failed to accept a reasonable admissible offer from defendant; issue-based costs orders are appropriate given clear and distinct issues.

Court Disposition

Costs apportioned: claimant recovers 25% of his costs pre-14 January 2004; defendant recovers 75% of its costs pre-14 January 2004; claimant bears own costs post-14 January 2004; defendant recovers 75% of its costs post-14 January 2004.

Orders

  • Claimant to recover 25% of his costs from defendant for period prior to 14 January 2004.
  • Defendant to recover 75% of its costs from claimant for period prior to 14 January 2004.