R v Keilan Roberts
The sentencing judge erred by not considering both alcohol and drug levels together in the guideline table, resulting in an unduly lenient sentence. The correct starting point should have been higher due to substantial impairment from combined intoxication. The sentence was increased accordingly.
- Parties
- Offender: Keilan Roberts; Applicant: His Majesty’s Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- sentence increased on appeal
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Careless Driving, Sentencing Guidelines, Drink and Drug Driving, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Disqualification From Driving
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keilan Roberts
Offender
His Majesty’s Attorney General
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original sentence for causing death by careless driving under the influence of drink and drugs was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper application of sentencing guidelines for combined alcohol and drug intoxication
- 3 Assessment of aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by not considering both alcohol and drug levels together in the guideline table, resulting in an unduly lenient sentence. The correct starting point should have been higher due to substantial impairment from combined intoxication. The sentence was increased accordingly.
Court Disposition
sentence increased on appeal
Orders
- Sentences on counts 1 to 4 quashed and replaced with 5 years 3 months imprisonment each, to run concurrently.
- Driving disqualification increased to 12 years 7½ months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment