R v BAB
The sentencing judge failed to give proper weight to the victim's vulnerability, the imbalance of power, the psychological harm, and other aggravating features. The mitigating factors were overvalued. The sentence of four and a half years was unduly lenient and outside the range of proper judicial discretion. The appropriate sentence is eight years' imprisonment.
- Parties
- Applicant: His Majesty's Attorney General; Offender: BAB
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Vulnerability of Victim, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
His Majesty's Attorney General
Applicant
BAB
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for rape was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability under Sentencing Council guidelines
- 3 Assessment of aggravating and mitigating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge failed to give proper weight to the victim's vulnerability, the imbalance of power, the psychological harm, and other aggravating features. The mitigating factors were overvalued. The sentence of four and a half years was unduly lenient and outside the range of proper judicial discretion. The appropriate sentence is eight years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
sentence increased
Orders
- Leave granted to refer sentence as unduly lenient
- Original sentence of four and a half years quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment