R v Steven Carl Evans
The custodial period of 24 years was unduly lenient given the gravity and multiplicity of the offences. A custodial period of at least 30 years was required to reflect the overall seriousness, but a life sentence was not mandatory as the judge was entitled to conclude it was not necessary as a last resort. The extended sentence structure was appropriate, but the custodial term was increased to 30 years.
- Parties
- Applicant: His Majesty’s Solicitor General; Respondent/offender: Steven Carl Evans
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (reference by Attorney General) / Sentence Review Under Section 36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
- Outcome
- Sentence increased on reference; custodial term substituted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Appeal, Unduly Lenient Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
His Majesty’s Solicitor General
Applicant
Steven Carl Evans
Respondent/offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (reference by Attorney General) / Sentence Review Under Section 36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was unduly lenient
- 2 Whether a life sentence was required under section 285 of the Sentencing Code
- 3 Appropriateness of concurrent sentences for multiple sexual offences
Ratio Decidendi
The custodial period of 24 years was unduly lenient given the gravity and multiplicity of the offences. A custodial period of at least 30 years was required to reflect the overall seriousness, but a life sentence was not mandatory as the judge was entitled to conclude it was not necessary as a last resort. The extended sentence structure was appropriate, but the custodial term was increased to 30 years.
Court Disposition
Sentence increased on reference; custodial term substituted
Orders
- Custodial period increased to 30 years’ imprisonment on count 30
- Extended licence period of 8 years maintained
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment