Medenta Finance Ltd v Hitachi Capital (UK) Plc
Clause 15(8) of the 2011 Agreement means Hitachi will not actively market third party products (i.e. products of persons other than Hitachi and Medenta) to existing Suppliers or customers introduced by Medenta. The clause does not prohibit Hitachi from soliciting or marketing its own products to existing Suppliers during the agreement. The word 'Supplier' refers only to current Suppliers. No rectification or implied term is justified as the contract reflects the parties’ intentions. The clause, if extended to former Suppliers, would be an unreasonable restraint of trade. The Supplier information is not confidential to Medenta.
- Parties
- Claimant: Medenta Finance Limited; Defendant: Hitachi Capital (UK) PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Expedited Trial on Liability
- Outcome
- Claims for rectification, implication of terms, and confidentiality dismissed; construction of clauses determined in favour of Hitachi; relief to be addressed separately.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contract Terms, Rectification, Implied Terms, Restraint of Trade, Confidentiality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Medenta Finance Limited
Claimant
Hitachi Capital (UK) PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Expedited Trial on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of clauses 15(8) and 17(4) of the 2011 Agreement
- 2 Whether clause 15(8) should be rectified
- 3 Whether a term should be implied into the 2011 Agreement as alleged by Medenta
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 15(8) of the 2011 Agreement means Hitachi will not actively market third party products (i.e. products of persons other than Hitachi and Medenta) to existing Suppliers or customers introduced by Medenta. The clause does not prohibit Hitachi from soliciting or marketing its own products to existing Suppliers during the agreement. The word 'Supplier' refers only to current Suppliers. No rectification or implied term is justified as the contract reflects the parties’ intentions. The clause, if extended to former Suppliers, would be an unreasonable restraint of trade. The Supplier information is not confidential to Medenta.
Court Disposition
Claims for rectification, implication of terms, and confidentiality dismissed; construction of clauses determined in favour of Hitachi; relief to be addressed separately.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment