Attorney General's Reference No 96 of 2004 [2004] EWCA Crim 2853 (02 November 2004)

Attorney General's Reference No 96 of 2004 [2004] EWCA Crim 2853 (02 November 2004)

Given the offender's criminal record, use of a weapon, degree of violence, and aggravating features, the original sentence was unduly lenient; a sentence of three years and nine months is appropriate, balancing aggravation and mitigation.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Crim 2853
Parties
Applicant: HM Attorney General; Offender: Martin Thomas Keenan
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 November 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General / Application for Leave to Refer Sentence as Unduly Lenient Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Outcome
Sentence increased on count 1 (robbery) from three years to three years and nine months' imprisonment; other sentences unchanged.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Robbery, Grievous Bodily Harm, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Unduly Lenient Sentences, Attorney General's Reference
Criminal Law Sentencing Robbery Grievous Bodily Harm Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm Unduly Lenient Sentences Attorney General's Reference

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HM Attorney General

Applicant

Martin Thomas Keenan

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Reference by Attorney General / Application for Leave to Refer Sentence as Unduly Lenient Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for robbery and associated violent offences was unduly lenient
  2. 2 Appropriate sentencing range for robbery with aggravating features and prior convictions

Ratio Decidendi

Given the offender's criminal record, use of a weapon, degree of violence, and aggravating features, the original sentence was unduly lenient; a sentence of three years and nine months is appropriate, balancing aggravation and mitigation.

Court Disposition

Sentence increased on count 1 (robbery) from three years to three years and nine months' imprisonment; other sentences unchanged.

Orders

  • Quash sentence of three years on count 1 and substitute three years and nine months' imprisonment
  • Sentences on other counts to remain concurrent and unchanged