IDT Card Services Ireland Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Customs & Excise
The UK is not entitled to charge VAT on telecommunications services supplied from Ireland to UK end-users via multifunctional cards, as the place of supply under Article 9(1) of the Sixth Directive is Ireland, and there is no principle in the Directive or UK law permitting the UK to tax such supplies in these circumstances. The structure does not constitute abuse or tax avoidance under EU law, and ICSIL and Interdirect cannot be treated as the same person for VAT purposes under UK law.
- Parties
- Claimant: IDT Card Services Ireland Limited; Defendant: HM Customs and Excise
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application succeeds for the claimant; UK not entitled to charge VAT on the supply in question.
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax (vat), Interpretation of Directives, Tax Avoidance, Place of Supply Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IDT Card Services Ireland Limited
Claimant
HM Customs and Excise
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the UK is entitled to charge VAT on telecommunications services supplied from Ireland to UK end-users via multifunctional cards under Schedule 10A of the Value Added Tax Act 1994, interpreted in light of the Sixth Directive.
- 2 Whether the supply structure constitutes tax avoidance or abuse under EU law.
- 3 Whether ICSIL and Interdirect are to be treated as the same person for VAT purposes under UK law.
Ratio Decidendi
The UK is not entitled to charge VAT on telecommunications services supplied from Ireland to UK end-users via multifunctional cards, as the place of supply under Article 9(1) of the Sixth Directive is Ireland, and there is no principle in the Directive or UK law permitting the UK to tax such supplies in these circumstances. The structure does not constitute abuse or tax avoidance under EU law, and ICSIL and Interdirect cannot be treated as the same person for VAT purposes under UK law.
Court Disposition
Application succeeds for the claimant; UK not entitled to charge VAT on the supply in question.
Orders
- Costs awarded to the claimant, to be assessed if not agreed.
- Permission to appeal granted; time for serving Notice of Appeal extended to 31st January.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment