Norris v Revenue & Customs [2010] EWHC 90178 (Costs) (09 July 2010)
The exacerbation or acceleration of a pre-existing disease by the employer's conduct falls within the definition of 'disease' under CPR Part 45 Section V, entitling the claimant's solicitors to a 100% success fee as per the fixed costs regime for Type B disease claims.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 90178 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant: Irene Norris; Defendant: HM Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment / Detailed Assessment of Costs
- Outcome
- 100% success fee allowed for claimant's solicitors' profit costs under the fixed costs regime for disease claims.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Success Fees, Employer's Liability, Disease Claims, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Irene Norris
Claimant
HM Revenue & Customs
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment / Detailed Assessment of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a 100% success fee is justified under the Collective Conditional Fee Agreement for an exacerbation of pre-existing disease in an employer's liability claim
- 2 Whether the claim falls within the fixed costs regime for disease claims under CPR Part 45 Section V
Ratio Decidendi
The exacerbation or acceleration of a pre-existing disease by the employer's conduct falls within the definition of 'disease' under CPR Part 45 Section V, entitling the claimant's solicitors to a 100% success fee as per the fixed costs regime for Type B disease claims.
Court Disposition
100% success fee allowed for claimant's solicitors' profit costs under the fixed costs regime for disease claims.
Orders
- Claimant's solicitors entitled to a 100% success fee on profit costs.
- Costs assessed at £9,415.42.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment