Hay v HM Treasury [2009] EWHC 1677 (Admin) (10 July 2009)
Where neither the claimant nor the UK government knows the full basis for the claimant's designation by the UN 1267 Committee, the AQO precludes effective judicial review and access to a remedy, rendering it ultra vires section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 as applied to the claimant.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1677 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Hay; Defendant: HM Treasury; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Ultra Vires, Access to Courts, UN Sanctions, Asset Freezing Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hay
Claimant
HM Treasury
Defendant
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Al Qaida and Taliban (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 (AQO) is ultra vires section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 as applied to the claimant
- 2 Whether the AQO unlawfully precludes effective judicial review and access to a remedy for the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
Where neither the claimant nor the UK government knows the full basis for the claimant's designation by the UN 1267 Committee, the AQO precludes effective judicial review and access to a remedy, rendering it ultra vires section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946 as applied to the claimant.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- The Al Qaida and Taliban (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 is quashed insofar as it applies to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment