NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST v HOLLY REBECCA WHITE
Miss White deliberately and dishonestly made false statements to medical experts and in her witness statement, exaggerating her disability to increase the value of her clinical negligence claim, knowing this would interfere with the administration of justice. The seriousness of her conduct, the scale of the claim,...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: North Bristol NHS Trust; Defendant: Holly Rebecca White
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Committal for Contempt of Court (arising From Clinical Negligence Claim) / Sentencing Judgment After Admissions of Contempt
- Outcome
- Defendant sentenced to 6 months immediate imprisonment for contempt of court.
- Legal Topics
- False Statements Verified by Statement of Truth, Dishonesty in Civil Proceedings, Sanctions for Contempt, Clinical Negligence Claims, Exaggeration of Disability, Interim Payments, Costs Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Bristol NHS Trust
Claimant
Holly Rebecca White
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Committal for Contempt of Court (arising From Clinical Negligence Claim) / Sentencing Judgment After Admissions of Contempt
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant made false statements in documents verified by a statement of truth without honest belief in their truth
- 2 Whether the false statements interfered with the administration of justice
- 3 Appropriate sanction for contempt of court in the context of a clinical negligence claim
Ratio Decidendi
Miss White deliberately and dishonestly made false statements to medical experts and in her witness statement, exaggerating her disability to increase the value of her clinical negligence claim, knowing this would interfere with the administration of justice. The seriousness of her conduct, the scale of the claim, and the lack of early insight or remorse justified a custodial sentence. Mitigation, including her mental health and caring responsibilities, reduced the sentence but did not justify suspension. Immediate imprisonment was necessary to punish, deter, and uphold the integrity of the justice system.
Court Disposition
Defendant sentenced to 6 months immediate imprisonment for contempt of court.
Orders
- Defendant to serve 6 months imprisonment, entitled to release after 3 months (half sentence).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment