Quartzelec Ltd v Honeywell Control Systems Ltd

Quartzelec Ltd v Honeywell Control Systems Ltd

The adjudicator made a material jurisdictional error and breached natural justice by refusing to consider the omissions defence, which was open to Honeywell as a defence to Quartzelec’s money claim. This rendered the entire adjudicator’s decision unenforceable and summary judgment must be refused.

Parties
Claimant: Quartzelec Limited; Defendant: Honeywell Control Systems Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 December 2008
Procedural Posture
Commercial Construction Dispute (summary Judgment Application) / Ruling on Application for Summary Judgment to Enforce Adjudicator’s Decision
Outcome
Application for summary judgment refused; adjudicator’s decision not enforced.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Natural Justice, Withholding Notices, Severance of Adjudicator’s Decision
Construction Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Jurisdiction of Adjudicator Natural Justice Withholding Notices Severance of Adjudicator’s Decision

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Quartzelec Limited

Claimant

Honeywell Control Systems Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Construction Dispute (summary Judgment Application) / Ruling on Application for Summary Judgment to Enforce Adjudicator’s Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to consider the omissions defence raised by the defendant
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator’s failure to consider the omissions defence was a breach of natural justice
  3. 3 Whether the adjudicator’s decision could be severed to enforce the unaffected part

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator made a material jurisdictional error and breached natural justice by refusing to consider the omissions defence, which was open to Honeywell as a defence to Quartzelec’s money claim. This rendered the entire adjudicator’s decision unenforceable and summary judgment must be refused.

Court Disposition

Application for summary judgment refused; adjudicator’s decision not enforced.