Automotive Latch Systems Ltd v Honeywell International Inc

Automotive Latch Systems Ltd v Honeywell International Inc

Honeywell established that ALS would probably be unable to pay a costs order if made, satisfying the jurisdictional threshold for security for costs. There were no discretionary factors justifying refusal of security, and the evidence did not show that an order would stifle the claim. However, the amount sought by Honeywell was excessive; a lower sum was appropriate.

Parties
Claimant: Automotive Latch Systems Limited; Defendant: Honeywell International Inc.
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 September 2006
Procedural Posture
Commercial Litigation / Application for Security for Costs
Outcome
Application for security for costs granted in part
Legal Topics
Security for Costs, Jurisdiction, Discretion in Security for Costs Applications
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Security for Costs Jurisdiction Discretion in Security for Costs Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Automotive Latch Systems Limited

Claimant

Honeywell International Inc.

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Litigation / Application for Security for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to order security for costs against the claimant under CPR 25.13(2)(c)
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to order security for costs in the circumstances of the case
  3. 3 The appropriate quantum of security for costs

Ratio Decidendi

Honeywell established that ALS would probably be unable to pay a costs order if made, satisfying the jurisdictional threshold for security for costs. There were no discretionary factors justifying refusal of security, and the evidence did not show that an order would stifle the claim. However, the amount sought by Honeywell was excessive; a lower sum was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Application for security for costs granted in part

Orders

  • ALS to provide security for costs in the sum of £500,000
  • Further directions on form and timing of security to be addressed at hand-down