Adolf Nissen Elektrobau GmbH & Co KG v Horizont Group GmbH [2019] EWHC 3522 (IPEC) (18 December 2019)
The patent lacks inventive step because the claimed features would have been obvious to a skilled person in light of the prior art (DE007 and the Nissen Board), and the modifications required were within the common general knowledge at the relevant date. Regulatory or safety concerns do not affect the technical obviousness analysis.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 3522 (IPEC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Adolf Nissen Elektrobau GmbH & Co KG; Defendant: Horizont Group GmbH
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Revocation / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Patent revoked as invalid for lack of inventive step.
- Legal Topics
- Inventive Step, Patent Validity, Obviousness, Prior Art
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adolf Nissen Elektrobau GmbH & Co KG
Claimant
Horizont Group GmbH
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Revocation / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether UK Patent No. 2,410,366 lacks inventive step over prior art and is therefore invalid.
Ratio Decidendi
The patent lacks inventive step because the claimed features would have been obvious to a skilled person in light of the prior art (DE007 and the Nissen Board), and the modifications required were within the common general knowledge at the relevant date. Regulatory or safety concerns do not affect the technical obviousness analysis.
Court Disposition
Patent revoked as invalid for lack of inventive step.
Orders
- UK Patent No. 2,410,366 is revoked.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment