Horne & Meredith Properties v Cox & Anor
Extensive, unreasonable, and disproportionate litigation by the tenants over rights granted under the tenancy constitutes a reason connected with the use or management of the holding under section 30(1)(c) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, justifying refusal of a new tenancy.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Horne & Meredith Properties; Respondent: Cox; Respondent: Billingsley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lease Renewal, Section 30(1)(c) Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, Litigation Between Landlord and Tenant, Use and Management of Holding
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Horne & Meredith Properties
Applicant
Cox
Respondent
Billingsley
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extensive litigation between landlord and tenant constitutes a reason connected with the use or management of the holding under section 30(1)(c) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Ratio Decidendi
Extensive, unreasonable, and disproportionate litigation by the tenants over rights granted under the tenancy constitutes a reason connected with the use or management of the holding under section 30(1)(c) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, justifying refusal of a new tenancy.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Tenancy termination order upheld
- No new tenancy granted to respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment