Baker, R (on the application of) v Hossack
The reasons of the applicants for making the complaints are irrelevant to the determination of the disciplinary issues before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The applicants have no material or relevant evidence to give, as they were not involved in the litigation and cannot comment on the truth of the allegations. The witness summonses are therefore set aside.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Queen on the Application of Baker; Defendant: Hossack
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Application to Set Aside Witness Summonses
- Outcome
- Witness summonses set aside
- Legal Topics
- Witness Summons, Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, Judicial Review, Professional Misconduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the Application of Baker
Claimant
Hossack
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Application to Set Aside Witness Summonses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the witness summonses issued against Councillor Baker and Mr Robinson should be set aside
- 2 Whether the applicants can provide material or relevant evidence in the disciplinary proceedings against Mrs Hossack
Ratio Decidendi
The reasons of the applicants for making the complaints are irrelevant to the determination of the disciplinary issues before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The applicants have no material or relevant evidence to give, as they were not involved in the litigation and cannot comment on the truth of the allegations. The witness summonses are therefore set aside.
Court Disposition
Witness summonses set aside
Orders
- The witness orders against Councillor Baker and Mr Robinson are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment