Haines v Sarner
The risk assumed by the Claimant’s solicitors under the CFA entered into on 24 November 2003 was minimal, as liability had already been resolved and the only remaining risk was as to quantum. The CFA ensured recovery of base costs even if a Part 36 offer was not beaten, and the risks cited by the Claimant’s solicitors were inherent in any retainer and not compensable by a success fee. Therefore, the recoverable success fee is assessed at 5%.
- Parties
- Claimant: Victor Sidney Haines; Defendant: Howard Keith Sarner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment / Judgment on Reasonableness of Success Fee Under Conditional Fee Agreement
- Outcome
- Success fee reduced to 5%
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Success Fees, Detailed Assessment of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Victor Sidney Haines
Claimant
Howard Keith Sarner
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment / Judgment on Reasonableness of Success Fee Under Conditional Fee Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 60% success fee claimed under the Conditional Fee Agreement dated 24 November 2003 is reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The risk assumed by the Claimant’s solicitors under the CFA entered into on 24 November 2003 was minimal, as liability had already been resolved and the only remaining risk was as to quantum. The CFA ensured recovery of base costs even if a Part 36 offer was not beaten, and the risks cited by the Claimant’s solicitors were inherent in any retainer and not compensable by a success fee. Therefore, the recoverable success fee is assessed at 5%.
Court Disposition
Success fee reduced to 5%
Orders
- Recoverable success fee assessed at 5%
- Permission granted to restore detailed assessment to determine any further outstanding issues including costs of the detailed assessment proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment