Deputy Chief Legal Ombudsman v Young

Deputy Chief Legal Ombudsman v Young

The defendant, a solicitor, failed without reasonable excuse to comply with a statutory notice issued by the ombudsman under s.147 Legal Services Act 2007, despite repeated opportunities and warnings. His default persisted for about 2.5 months, causing prejudice to clients and wasting regulatory resources. Although he later apologised and co-operated, a financial penalty was justified to mark the seriousness of the default and deter others. Imprisonment was not warranted in the circumstances.

Parties
Claimant: Deputy Chief Legal Ombudsman (Mr Gary Garland); Defendant: Howard Robert Gillespie Young
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (administrative Court) / Judgment After Inquiry and Submissions
Outcome
Application granted; defendant dealt with as if in contempt of court; financial penalty imposed.
Legal Topics
Ombudsman Enforcement, Solicitor Discipline, Contempt of Court (quasi Contempt), Legal Services Act 2007, Failure to Comply With Statutory Notice
Legal Profession Regulation Administrative Law Civil Procedure Ombudsman Enforcement Solicitor Discipline Contempt of Court (quasi Contempt) Legal Services Act 2007 Failure to Comply With Statutory Notice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Deputy Chief Legal Ombudsman (Mr Gary Garland)

Claimant

Howard Robert Gillespie Young

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Part 8 Claim (administrative Court) / Judgment After Inquiry and Submissions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate procedure for enforcement of an ombudsman's notice under s.149 Legal Services Act 2007?
  2. 2 Did the defendant solicitor fail without reasonable excuse to comply with a s.147 notice?
  3. 3 What sanction should be imposed for such default?

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, a solicitor, failed without reasonable excuse to comply with a statutory notice issued by the ombudsman under s.147 Legal Services Act 2007, despite repeated opportunities and warnings. His default persisted for about 2.5 months, causing prejudice to clients and wasting regulatory resources. Although he later apologised and co-operated, a financial penalty was justified to mark the seriousness of the default and deter others. Imprisonment was not warranted in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Application granted; defendant dealt with as if in contempt of court; financial penalty imposed.

Orders

  • Defendant fined £5,000, payable by 4 January 2012.
  • Defendant to pay ombudsman's costs of £15,550 by 7 December 2011.