Hassan Ali Bin Ali Al-Muslimani v Hrach Ghazarian
Notice of dishonour was not required as the bank account had insufficient funds, but the September 2019 agreement may have superseded the cheque obligations; factual and contractual matrix not fully established, so summary judgment cannot be granted at this stage.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hassan Ali Bin Ali Al-Muslimani; Defendant: Hrach Ghazarian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Summary Judgment/strike Out
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment/strike out adjourned; permission granted to claimant to amend pleadings to include claim based on 2019 agreement; permission for defendant to amend consequentially; further applications required for additional amendments.
- Legal Topics
- Bills of Exchange, Cheques, Notice of Dishonour, Summary Judgment, Contractual Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hassan Ali Bin Ali Al-Muslimani
Claimant
Hrach Ghazarian
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Summary Judgment/strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether notice of dishonour was required for liability on the cheque under the Bills of Exchange Act 1882
- 2 Whether the September 2019 agreement superseded the obligations under the December 2017 cheque
- 3 Whether the claimant can amend pleadings to rely on the 2019 agreement
Ratio Decidendi
Notice of dishonour was not required as the bank account had insufficient funds, but the September 2019 agreement may have superseded the cheque obligations; factual and contractual matrix not fully established, so summary judgment cannot be granted at this stage.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment/strike out adjourned; permission granted to claimant to amend pleadings to include claim based on 2019 agreement; permission for defendant to amend consequentially; further applications required for additional amendments.
Orders
- Claimant granted permission to amend pleadings to include claim based on September 2019 agreement.
- Defendant granted permission to amend pleadings consequentially upon claimant's amendments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment