BUQ v HRE
The Employment Tribunal is better placed to determine the financial allegations, which are relevant to the credibility of sexual allegations in the privacy action. Adjourning the High Court trial until after the ET determination will better serve justice and avoid unnecessary duplication or prejudice.
- Parties
- Claimant: BUQ; Defendant: HRE
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Civil Action / Application for Adjournment of Trial
- Outcome
- Trial date vacated; action adjourned
- Legal Topics
- Adjournment of Trial, Overlap of Proceedings, Res Judicata, Credibility, Use of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BUQ
Claimant
HRE
Defendant
Procedural Posture
High Court Civil Action / Application for Adjournment of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court trial should be adjourned pending determination of related Employment Tribunal proceedings
- 2 Whether findings in the Employment Tribunal will assist or prejudice the High Court proceedings
- 3 Whether the interests of non-parties (Employer Respondents) are affected by the timing of the High Court trial
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal is better placed to determine the financial allegations, which are relevant to the credibility of sexual allegations in the privacy action. Adjourning the High Court trial until after the ET determination will better serve justice and avoid unnecessary duplication or prejudice.
Court Disposition
Trial date vacated; action adjourned
Orders
- The date for the trial of the privacy action is vacated.
- The action is to be relisted as soon as practical after final determination of the Employment Tribunal proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment