Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd & Ors [2015] EWHC 3837 (Ch) (16 December 2015)
The outcome of the non-technical trial will not affect the costs attributable to the technical trial; therefore, immediate costs order in favour of claimant is appropriate and reservation of costs is not justified.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 3837 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Unwired Planet International Limited; Defendant: Huawei Technologies Co., Limited; Defendant: Huawei Technologies (UK) Co., Limited; Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Limited; Defendant: Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited; Defendant: Google Inc.; Defendant: Google Ireland Limited; Defendant: Google Commerce Limited; Ninth Party: Unwired Planet, Inc.; Tenth Party: Unwired Planet LLC; Eleventh Party: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Validity / Post Trial Costs Order Following Technical Trial
- Outcome
- Costs order in favour of claimant; permission to appeal granted on specified grounds.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Patent Infringement, FRAND Licensing, Costs Orders, Competition Law (articles 101 and 102)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unwired Planet International Limited
Claimant
Huawei Technologies Co., Limited
Defendant
Huawei Technologies (UK) Co., Limited
Defendant
Samsung Electronics Co., Limited
Defendant
Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited
Defendant
Google Inc.
Defendant
Google Ireland Limited
Defendant
Google Commerce Limited
Defendant
Unwired Planet, Inc.
Ninth Party
Unwired Planet LLC
Tenth Party
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Eleventh Party
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Validity / Post Trial Costs Order Following Technical Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate costs order following technical patent trial
- 2 Impact of pending non-technical trial on costs
- 3 Whether costs should be reserved or awarded immediately
Ratio Decidendi
The outcome of the non-technical trial will not affect the costs attributable to the technical trial; therefore, immediate costs order in favour of claimant is appropriate and reservation of costs is not justified.
Court Disposition
Costs order in favour of claimant; permission to appeal granted on specified grounds.
Orders
- Defendants to pay claimant's costs attributable to Technical Trial A, to be assessed if not agreed.
- Defendants to make interim payment to claimant of £1,270,800 by 4 p.m. on 20th January 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment